The Encyclopedia of Economic Statecraft

Case

War by the United States and Israel against Iran, including Operation Epic Fury (2026)

Version 2.0.0-alphaLast reviewed 29 July 2026Editorially checkedAll rights reserved

The war opened by the United States and Israel against Iran on 28 February 2026 combined direct military attack, maritime interdiction and economic-system targeting. Operation Epic Fury was the United States operational phase that ended after an April ceasefire. A June memorandum did not terminate the wider conflict: renewed United States-Iran hostilities began in July, and the war remained unsettled on 29 July 2026. Its economic dimension is wartime economic action because physical attack and interdiction produced much of the effect.

Opening phase and declared purpose

The White House announced Operation Epic Fury on 1 March, describing an operation begun on 28 February. The administration declared objectives including dismantling Iranian security and military capabilities, reducing nuclear and missile threats, and restoring navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. These are statements of United States purpose, not independent findings about effect, legality or every target.

United States Central Command's 6 April fact sheet supplies the military's campaign dates, target categories and claimed operational totals. Those figures are attributed battle-damage assessments. They do not independently establish destruction, strategic effect or the legal status of each attack.

The United States and Israel were direct senders in the opening phase. Iran was the target of attacks on military, security, nuclear, maritime, energy and infrastructure systems and conducted its own military response. Pakistan and Qatar acted as mediators, not co-senders. Pre-existing sanctions remained a separate statecraft layer and should not be merged into the effects of airstrikes or maritime interdiction.

April ceasefire and June memorandum

The first operational phase ended in April. The United States said the ceasefire was ordered on 7 April and took effect on 8 April. A later Office of Management and Budget statement likewise said that hostilities begun on 28 February terminated with the ceasefire ordered on 7 April. These sources establish the administration's position on the end of Operation Epic Fury, not the end of every conflict involving Iran.

The United States and Iran signed a memorandum on 17 June after mediation by Pakistan and Qatar. The Associated Press account and transcript identifies the reported text and the limits of its public provenance. It should not be called an Islamabad Memorandum signed in Islamabad. The White House's 19 June description records the administration's characterisation and listed endorsements. It does not prove that the arrangement was durable.

Renewed July fighting

The memorandum collapsed when renewed United States-Iran military confrontation began on 7 July. United Nations briefings on 8 July and 14 July record renewed strikes, calls for de-escalation and maritime civilian harm. The United Nations 20 July update describes continued attacks and civilian exposure.

The renewed July campaign should not be called Operation Epic Fury. On 28 July, Associated Press reported that the Pentagon treated Epic Fury as concluded and placed later casualties in a separate category. By 26 July, airstrikes had paused while negotiations continued, but neither that pause nor talks established a durable end to the wider war.

Economic and humanitarian effects

Physical damage, port and shipping disruption, insurance repricing and constraints on navigation affected Iran and wider energy trade. These channels differ from financial designation. No single public estimate can establish aggregate GDP loss, reconstruction cost or long-term productive damage while the conflict remains live. Government statements, military target counts, market prices and scenario models measure different things and must not be aggregated.

United Nations reporting describes severe civilian deaths, injuries, displacement and damage to essential infrastructure. The Humanitarian Update of 3 April provides attributed provisional figures for the opening phase. Later United Nations reporting records continuing harm after renewed fighting. Incident attribution, civilian status and economic intent require claim-level evidence; civilian harm should not be treated as an economic-effect metric.

Assessment

Operation Epic Fury achieved major physical and maritime effects according to the United States record, but its strategic durability is unresolved. The April ceasefire ended that operational phase, the June memorandum failed, and renewed fighting exposed the difference between a concluded operation and an unsettled war. Claims of victory, comprehensive economic collapse, regime change or durable reopening of navigation exceed the evidence available on 29 July 2026.

The case is a direct wartime economic-action record. Economic capacity was affected chiefly through ordnance and interdiction during armed conflict. Its assessment must remain phase-specific and provisional, with a fresh current-event check within 24 hours of publication.

See also

Disruption and contested control of the Strait of Hormuz during the 2026 Iran war (2026-present) · General License X and Iranian oil sanctions relief (2026) · United States maximum-pressure sanctions campaign against Iran (2018-2021) · Iranian sanctions-evasion networks (2012-present) · Combined-arms integration (financial-kinetic fusion) · Naval blockade · Economic warfare

Sources

Recommended citation

Cite this entry

Tennant, James J., ed. 'War by the United States and Israel against Iran, including Operation Epic Fury (2026).' The Encyclopedia of Economic Statecraft, version 2.0.0-alpha, last reviewed 29 July 2026. https://jamesjtennant.com/entries/2026-iran-war-and-operation-epic-fury-2026/.

Suggest an edit