Case
United States sanctions and tariffs in the Brunson dispute with Turkey (2018)
The United States used two different legal instruments in the 2018 dispute over the detention of Andrew Brunson. Targeted financial sanctions and a country-specific steel tariff increased pressure on Turkey, while financial markets amplified the shock against an already fragile economy.
On 1 August 2018, Treasury designated Turkey's justice and interior ministers under the Global Magnitsky programme. Treasury attributed responsibility for Brunson's detention to the two officials. That was a United States determination, not an adjudication of their individual conduct. On 10 August, Proclamation 9772 raised the Section 232 tariff on steel articles from Turkey to 50 per cent. The proclamation operated under trade law and covered steel imports; it was not part of the ministerial blocking action. Turkey subsequently retaliated with its own tariff changes.
The authorities also created different channels of exposure. The designations blocked property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction and generally prohibited transactions by United States persons. The tariff instead changed the border charge on a defined class of Turkish goods. The first instrument targeted two officials and their financial access. The second changed the commercial terms faced by Turkish steel exports. Combining them under one sanctions label obscures who was legally restricted and how the pressure travelled.
The lira depreciated sharply during 2018, including around the August measures. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey's daily United States dollar exchange-rate series provides the appropriate dated basis for event analysis. Yet the IMF later identified pre-existing inflation, foreign-currency exposure, external financing needs and policy credibility problems. Global risk conditions and domestic policy therefore remain rival causes. The United States actions can be described as an accelerant or event trigger only where the observation window and exchange-rate definition are stated.
A defensible event study would distinguish the exchange rate immediately before each announcement, the intraday or daily response, and the subsequent recovery or deterioration. It would also compare Turkey with other emerging markets exposed to the same global conditions. Annual depreciation cannot be allocated to a two-week policy episode without that benchmark. Nor can tariff incidence be inferred from the currency move, since importers, exporters and consumers may bear different portions of the border charge.
A Turkish court released Brunson on 12 October 2018. OFAC removed the two ministers from its list on 2 November. Proclamation 9886 returned the additional steel tariff to 25 per cent in May 2019. This sequence is consistent with reversible bargaining, but timing alone does not disclose the terms of any understanding. The narrow objective, Brunson's release, must also be separated from Turkey's longer recession and inflation path.
The case is therefore strongest as an example of market amplification under pre-existing vulnerability. It is weaker as proof that narrow economic measures independently caused a macroeconomic crisis or compelled an ally through a disclosed bargain.
See also
Global Magnitsky Act and EO 13818 (2016, 2017) · Section 232, Trade Expansion Act (1962) · Tariff as coercive instrument · Currency destabilisation · Economic coercion
Sources
- United States Department of the Treasury, Treasury sanctions Turkish officials with leading roles in unjust detention of United States pastor Andrew Brunson, 1 August 2018.
- President of the United States, Proclamation 9772, adjusting imports of steel into the United States, 10 August 2018.
- Office of Foreign Assets Control, Global Magnitsky delistings of Turkish officials, 2 November 2018.
- President of the United States, Proclamation 9886, adjusting imports of steel into the United States, 16 May 2019.
- International Monetary Fund, Turkey: 2019 Article IV consultation, 26 December 2019. The IMF host restricted automated access; report identifier 48876 and publication metadata were resolved manually.
- Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Exchange rates, daily official series; retain base currency, observation frequency and event dates in any quantitative use.
Recommended citation
Cite this entry
Tennant, James J., ed. 'United States sanctions and tariffs in the Brunson dispute with Turkey (2018).' The Encyclopedia of Economic Statecraft, version 2.0, last reviewed 29 July 2026. https://jamesjtennant.com/entries/us-sanctions-on-turkey-and-the-lira-crisis-2018/.
Suggest an edit