Case

United States maximum-pressure campaigns against Venezuela and Cuba (2019-present)

United States pressure on Venezuela and Cuba after 2019 comprised two legally and politically distinct sanctions programmes. They can be compared as maximum-pressure strategies, but they should not be treated as one campaign or as evidence that every measure had an immediate leadership-change objective.

Venezuela chronology

In January 2019 the United States recognised Juan Guaido as interim president and designated Petroleos de Venezuela, restricting oil revenue and financial access. Later executive action blocked property of the Venezuelan government, while licences created and adjusted exceptions. Washington also used partial relief as bargaining leverage around electoral negotiations.

The chronology changed decisively on 3 January 2026, when a United States military operation supporting law enforcement captured Maduro and Cilia Flores and transferred them to New York to face pending charges. Delcy Rodriguez assumed the role of acting president. This was not sanctions-induced voluntary compliance. Direct force, oil-vessel seizures and later United States control over specified oil-revenue arrangements must be separated from the sanctions record. OFAC subsequently amended licences across oil, petrochemical and minerals activity. By 29 July 2026, the programme had become a changing instrument for managing the acting authorities and sectoral access, not simply a pre-existing maximum-pressure embargo.

Cuba chronology

The Cuba programme rests on older statutory authorities and a long-running embargo. From 2019 the United States activated Title III litigation under the Helms-Burton Act and tightened travel and remittance channels. Pressure escalated in 2026. A January executive order created a process for tariffs concerning countries supplying oil to Cuba, and a separate May order established an additional designation authority. OFAC issued and amended licences as those measures developed. These actions combined compellence, punishment, signalling and domestic political objectives.

The Cuban government remained in power. That result does not establish that every narrower objective failed, but it does mean leadership change cannot be counted as achieved.

Assessment

The comparison should use declared tests: political transition, electoral or policy concession, revenue denial, bargaining leverage, signalling and civilian cost. Maduro's removal satisfied a leadership-change description only in the narrow factual sense; it does not demonstrate that sanctions compelled a concession. Cuba's leadership remained in place. Humanitarian attribution remains contested because domestic controls, longstanding economic weakness, pandemic disruption, loss of Venezuelan supply and United States pressure affected the same channels.

All legal-status statements are dated to 29 July 2026. Statutes, executive orders, designations, general licences and relevant litigation require a fresh check on publication day.

See also

United States sanctions against Venezuela and PDVSA (2017-present) · United States embargo against Cuba (1960-present) · Helms-Burton Act (1996) · Sanctions effectiveness debate · Compellence · Humanitarian cost of sanctions

Sources

  1. United States Office of Foreign Assets Control, Venezuela-related sanctions programme, accessed 29 July 2026.
  2. United States Government Accountability Office, Venezuela: Additional Tracking Could Aid Treasury's Efforts to Mitigate Any Adverse Impacts United States Sanctions Might Have on Humanitarian Assistance, February 2021.
  3. Congressional Research Service, Venezuela: Political Crisis and United States Policy, version current on 29 July 2026.
  4. United States Office of Foreign Assets Control, Cuba sanctions programme, accessed 29 July 2026.
  5. Congressional Research Service, Cuba: United States Policy Overview, version current on 29 July 2026.
  6. Congressional Research Service, Cuba Sanctions: Legislative Restrictions Limiting the Normalisation of Relations, version current on 29 July 2026.
  7. Congressional Research Service, United States Capture of Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro: Considerations for Congress, updated 12 January 2026.
  8. President of the United States, 'Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of Cuba', 29 January 2026.
  9. President of the United States, 'Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy', 1 May 2026.

Recommended citation

Cite this entry

Tennant, James J., ed. 'United States maximum-pressure campaigns against Venezuela and Cuba (2019-present).' The Encyclopedia of Economic Statecraft, version 2.0, last reviewed 29 July 2026. https://jamesjtennant.com/entries/regime-capture-strategy-limits-in-venezuela-and-cuba-2019-2026/.

Suggest an edit