Institution

Reichsbank (Germany, 1876-1945)

The Reichsbank was Germany's central bank from 1876 to 1945. Its legal position and conduct changed across Imperial, Weimar and Nazi Germany. Under the Nazi regime it helped finance rearmament, administer exchange controls and process assets acquired through occupation and persecution. Period, leadership and transaction boundaries are essential to any account.

Institutional change

The bank began operating in 1876 as part of German monetary unification. It became central to the 1923 inflation and stabilisation. Hjalmar Schacht served as president from December 1923 to 1930 and again from 1933 to January 1939. Walther Funk then held the presidency through the remaining Nazi period.

Nazi legal changes subordinated the bank progressively to the regime. This did not make every initiative identical to a personal order from Hitler, nor did it erase differences between the Reichsbank, Finance Ministry, Economics Ministry, military authorities, SS bodies and commercial banks.

Finance, clearing and plunder

Under Schacht the bank supported rearmament through mechanisms including Mefo bills, which deferred and obscured state obligations. It also participated in exchange controls and bilateral clearing arrangements that channelled trade and foreign exchange towards German priorities. These measures expanded room for manoeuvre under reserve constraint while building pressure for further extraction and territorial expansion.

During the war the Reichsbank received gold and valuables taken from occupied states and victims of Nazi persecution. Documentary records establish the bank's role in handling looted assets, including SS deposits associated with the false name Melmer. Specific quantities, dates and custody chains must be tied to archival records.

The March 1939 transfer of Czechoslovak gold through Bank for International Settlements accounts illustrates the institutional chain. The seizure, account instruction, BIS book entry, Bank of England custody and later use were related but distinct acts. No one intermediary should absorb the conduct of the whole chain.

Statecraft significance and safeguards

The Reichsbank shows how a constrained state can use central-bank credit, controlled clearing and seized assets to sustain mobilisation. These measures generated capacity but also deepened dependence on coercion and conquest. Adam Tooze places that contradiction near the centre of Nazi political economy.

The bank's documented participation in plunder warrants direct language. Care is still required not to assign criminal conduct to every employee or confuse institutional possession with original seizure. Leadership dates, legal status and asset quantities must be verified against the precise record.

Post-war treatment further demonstrates the need for institutional boundaries. Allied occupation authorities closed and reorganised German monetary institutions through several stages, while restitution claims and recovered reserves followed separate legal processes. The later Bank deutscher Länder and Deutsche Bundesbank were successor central-bank institutions, not a continuation of the Nazi Reichsbank's legal personality.

Quantitative claims about gold require special controls. Contemporary records may use fine-gold weight, currency values or account balances at different dates. Physical movement can differ from a book transfer, and the same holding can appear in several institutional records. Totals should not be combined without reconciling custody, title, valuation and duplication.

See also

Hjalmar Schacht · Schachtian bilateral clearing and the Reichsmark bloc (1934-1939) · Bank for International Settlements · Autarky · Total economic mobilisation · Economic warfare

Sources

Recommended citation

Cite this entry

Tennant, James J., ed. 'Reichsbank (Germany, 1876-1945).' The Encyclopedia of Economic Statecraft, version 2.0, last reviewed 29 July 2026. https://jamesjtennant.com/entries/reichsbank/.

Suggest an edit